58°
Weather by

View Full Forecast

Login | Register

facebook Icon rss Icon twitter Icon

World news

Back to Forum: Greenville News Board
166 replies [Last post]

Twitch
User offline. Last seen 1 year 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
hawkeye wrote:
That's nothing more than speculation, as obviously, if the documents are classified, neither you nor Paul Sperry have the faintest idea what information is in those documents, so, obviously, you haven't the faintest idea of what the hell you're talking about ( as usual )
Given the fact that 15 of the 19 alleged hijackers were from Saudi Arabia and the evidence for Saudi funding of alleged hijackers, and the ties between the Bushes and Bin Ladens and Saudi royalty, its pretty damn compelling that there was a role. What other nation do you think is implicated that is 'Shocking' according to these Congressmen? Evidence put for in this article is compelling to anyone but the dimmest and most anti-deductive thinkers.
Twitch
User offline. Last seen 1 year 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
hawkeye wrote:
Saudi Arabia?...I thought you said it was the Jews ( what a wackjob )
There's a Saudi connection to the hijackers who were blamed for carrying out the attacks. Some of the hijackers entered the US through the consulate in Jeddah without passports and expedited by the CIA. There's an Israeli connection to the van bombs on 9/11 with foreknowledge of the attacks....and the van bombs parked at the WTC that exploded before the demolitions. And there's a connection between Larry Silverstein and Mossad. No connection to Iraq or Afghanistan.
truthseeker
User offline. Last seen 1 year 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 18 2010
When one looks at the world news, one discovers that's it very murky and full of loose ends and then they decide that they will interpret reality in a whole new way, and that is called ENLIGHTENMENT ... but on a very beginner level...
truthseeker
hawkeye
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
Twitch wrote:
George W. Bush classified 28 pages of the 2002 report by Congress because it implicated Saudi Arabia, who we never retaliated against
The fact of the matter is 28 pages of the 2002 report remains classified, so unless you have security clearance ( which you would be guilty of violating by releasing the information in those classified documents ) you haven't the faintest idea of what the hell you're talking about, but, then again, that's nothing unusual for you
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth"~Theodore Roosevelt
hawkeye
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
Twitch wrote:
There's a Saudi connection to the hijackers and the CIA. There's an Israeli connection and there's a connection between Larry Silverstein and Mossad. No connection to Afghanistan.
Get some help dude http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-helpline
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth"~Theodore Roosevelt
Twitch
User offline. Last seen 1 year 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
Hawk is against Walter Jones' effort to disclose the identity of the country that attacked us. Why would you want to protect the identity of a country involved in 9/11??? Don't you want to retaliate? It's treason to protect perpetrators.
hawkeye
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
Twitch wrote:
Hawk is against Walter Jones' effort to disclose the identity of the country that attacked us.
According to Walter Jones' statement on his website: "If the 9/11 hijackers had outside help, particularly from one or more foreign governments..." Sooooooooo....what part of "If" do you not understand Twitch?
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth"~Theodore Roosevelt
Twitch
User offline. Last seen 1 year 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
Twitch wrote:
Hawk is against Walter Jones' effort to disclose the identity of the country that attacked us. Why would you want to protect the identity of a country involved in 9/11??? Don't you want to retaliate? It's treason to protect perpetrators.
The 9/11 Commission report of 2004 did not account for this information pertaining to the country that sponsored the attacks, claiming that the issue of who financed the hijackers was "of little practical significance." The 9/11 Commission report did not account for the "9/11 Oral Histories" which was classified until the following year 2005. These are accounts of hundreds of first responders reporting explosions in the buildings.
hawkeye
User offline. Last seen 1 year 41 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
Hey Twitch, get some help dude http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-helpline
"To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth"~Theodore Roosevelt
Twitch
User offline. Last seen 1 year 46 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: Sep 2 2010
hawkeye wrote:
Hey Twitch, get some help dude http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/mental-health-helpline
You get help. You want to protect the country that attacked us.

NCAA

Bless your heart
Bless your heart